вот что говорят на европейских форумах.
Great to have you on board.
It's hard to describe differences per se, because it's not always down to the driver alone that makes the midband special. The crossover network has a significant role as well. So perhaps the most appropriate comments I can make should be in the context of my experiences of them, and what I consider to be their strengths and weaknesses (if any).
CA15RLY - Sounds natural but is a little uneven tonally.
CA18RLY - Both natural and dynamically sounding, but not the most 'detailed'.
MCA15RCY - More dynamic than CA15RLY and more detailed than CA18RLY. Best value midrange driver.
M15CH001 - Stunningly real and smooth midrange, easy to work with too. The only downside is they're no longer available.
15M4531K - Very lively sounding, dynamic and detailed, but can be a bit fatiguing if the rising response is not tamed.
15W8530K01 - A most organic and fulsome sounding driver. Really hard to fault in a small box, and easy to work with too.
18W8535-00 - I used to think this was the best sounding midbass driver, until I heard the 15W8530K01. Again very natural and organic sounding, but gives some detail away to the little Revelator.
PHL1120 - Stunning dynamics and virtually unlimited headroom. Fantastic presence, but not the most tonally accurate driver. Requires a lot of correction in XO, and probably best suited for active crossover.
James
Динамика для меня приоритет! Электронная музыка да и вообще быструю музыку слушаю с большой скоростью но не драм анд басе :S... На сколько детальнее ca15 против ca18? мега детально? Если человеку как мне после с30 к примеру са18 будет не хуже?
![:) :)](/components/com_kunena/template/blue_eagle/images/emoticons/smile1.gif)
))